Common grammar and usage mistakes in Indian English

I, Me, and Myself are often confused.

This is a problem in the US, UK and in India. Many people forget how to speak English (properly) when referring to themselves, the moment someone else is involved in their sentence. Many educated people confuse these. In the US, there is often a tendency for people to avoid "Me" at all costs. Even our articulate President Obama has a problem with this! Uhhh, listen to this 20s snippet from, uh, Barack Obama's first, um, news conference, 7 Nov, 2008.

Common Examples:

• "Me and Anita are teaching class." ... ME is teaching class? NO!
  I and Anita (or Anita and I) are teaching class.
  In other words: I am teaching class and Anita is teaching class.

• "He came to dinner with Marty and I." ... He came for dinner with I? NO!
  He came with Marty and ME.
  In other words: He came with me and he came with Marty.

• "Linda and myself will be at the party." ... MYSELF will be at the party? NO!
  Linda and I will be at the party.
  In other words: I will be at the party and Linda will be at the party.

• "Please see Joseph or myself after class." ... I want you to see MYSELF after class? NO!
  Please see Joseph or me after class.
  In other words: See me or see Joe. = See me or Joe.

Formula for improvement:

If speaking about yourself and someone else:

1. Remove the other person from the situation.
2. Say the same sentence.
3. If it sounds wrong, it probably is.

Another simple formula:

• I affect the world. (active) "I picked up the pencil."
• The world affects ME. (passive) "The pencil was picked up by me."
• Only I affect MYSELF. (reflexive) "I looked at myself in the mirror."
• Only you affect YOURSELF. (reflexive) "You should listen to yourself speak."

You can't look at myself, talk to myself, feed myself or visit myself. Only I can affect myself! Similarly, I can't feed YOURSELF or talk to yourself. Only you act on yourself. (both are reflexive; they refer to the originator of the action.)

This is incorrect, unless you are reporting something else that happened since the call, such as: "Greg had called for you just before you left yesterday." Past perfect tense is used to express that an action had already been completed in the past, before another event (either implicit or explicit) occurred.

Simple PAST tense should be used: "Greg called for you." is correct.

...-3 ..................... -2 ..................... -1 ..................... 0 ..................... +1 ..................... +2 .................. +3
PAST ...............................................................PRESENT ...............................................................FUTURE

Correct usage: The train had left the station, five minutes before I arrived.

Similarly, Future Perfect tense is used for actions that will be completed some time in the future:
Examples:

• "By tomorrow, he will have sent the letter."
• "By the end of this year, I will have become a team leader."
• "I will have finished." (by then)

Many people are uncomfortable with silence when they are speaking. During what should be a pause of silence, noises continue to come from the mouths of many speakers. These filled pauses, or "fillers", act like verbal speed-bumps. The speaker's message becomes unsteady and difficult to comprehend.

It's natural to pause while speaking, as you consider what to say next. Clearly, it's best to be prepared; to know what you're going to say and how you will say it. Knowing exactly what you're going to say is the best way to eliminate fillers. However, this is not always possible. It's common for people to pause as they speak, to struggle for the right word when engaging in unscripted speech. Some of the most common fillers are "um", "uh", and "you know". We also hear "like" and "so" quite often... you know?

At no time has this become more apparent than in the recent months leading up to the 2008 Presidental election. President Barack Obama is clearly a thoughtful, intelligent, and articulate speaker. Hoewever, he has a terrific problem with fillers. Obama's favorite filler is "uhhh". In fact, he began is very first press conference with uhhh! (Here it is.) It does not add value or meaning. It's nothing more than a distraction.

Judge for yourself how much your comprehension goes UP if fillers are eliminated. Listen to this two-minute section of a radio call-in show. The guest not only speaks too fast and stutters, he uses excessive fillers. The host, a radio announcer who is being paid to speak to thousands of people, also muddles his message with constant fillers. For a brief time he does not use fillers, during a segment here the radio host reads to the listeners. It's the best part of the show.

Radio Call-In show and interview

• Uncut segment (2:08)
• Edited segment (1:35)
• Fillers Only (:30) - All of these fillers and stutters are extracted from the uncut segment above. A few more were later removed and not added to this file, in which case it would be longer and more excruciating. Enjoy!

President-elect Obama's first news conference, recorded live on Thursday, November 7th, 2008

The first six minutes of the session did not have many fillers, becasue he read a script. I've provided the last 13 minutes' worth which consisted of answers to questions by reporters. Unfortunately, many of the reporters' questions are inaudible.

• Uncut Q&A (12:56 - 7.4mb) - Uncut Q&A session
• Edited Q&A (11:27 - 6.5mb) - Q&A session minus the umms and uhhs.
• Fillers Only (1:34 - .9mb) - Fillers extracted from uncut version.

In Obama's defense, I must say how refreshing it is to finally have a leader who speaks in complete sentences! Obama's Use of Complete Sentences Stirs Controversy.

It's "its", not "it is"!

This problem ocurrs frequently in written communication. It's a non-issue in spoken communication.

Usually, nouns take on an apostrophe to indicate when the possessive tense is being used.

Example: "The car's color is too dark for my taste, but I love its powerful engine and roomy interior."
Here, "its" is used properly to denote the possessive tense.

Many people understandably get confused and write things like: "The sound of falling rain makes me sleepy, it's pitter-patter soothes my soul and puts me to sleep." This is not written properly because it's literally means it is. "It's raining outside." is correct. (That's a bit wordy; it generally doesn't rain inside!)

The root of this confusion is knowing that the possessive tense usually takes on an apostrophe. Hence, "IT" is an exception and can be difficult because it's very easy to become confused by its proper usage.

We have a similar mistake when we see an apostrophe at the end of a pluralized noun. ("There are many car's on the road.") One car; two cars, three cars.... NOT car's. A good/bad example.

How to Use There, Their and They're